Every project on this site carries one of three verdicts about whether it is worth holding for the next ten years.
Hold. A project likely to still be here in a decade, with a token that does real work and no finding that its holders are being extracted from, misled, or replaced by insiders.
Watch. A project that could go either way over the same horizon. The business may be real, but how the project is owned, run, or growing sits in a gray area that keeps the case from settling.
Avoid. A project where specific reasons not to hold have been found. Either the token has no clear reason to exist, or the way it works or is governed carries a defect that survives every argument in its favour.
None of these verdicts is a price call: a Hold does not mean buy now, and an Avoid does not mean sell now. Each is a judgment about the token itself, not the company or the technology behind it. A company can sign a client every week, and none of that revenue has to reach its token; a technology can be sound while the token routed through it has no clear job.
The token is what a person is buying, and the token is what these pages judge.
Ask Karinva
Highlight any sentence on this page and ask what it means, or choose a section and ask about that.
What Bitcoin is
Bitcoin is a form of money that runs on a network of computers instead of inside a company. Where a bank holds your account and moves your money, and where a government issues the dollars and controls how many of them exist, Bitcoin does both jobs itself. Nobody owns it, nobody runs it, and the rules for how it works are written into the software that every computer on the network runs.
The network settles payments in one currency, and one currency only: BTC, its own token. Everything the network does, from moving value between two people to rewarding the computers that keep it running, happens in BTC.
Bitcoin has been in continuous operation since January 2009. It is the oldest blockchain that still exists, and by a large margin the largest.
Why BTC exists
BTC does two jobs. It is the currency payments settle in, and it is the reward paid to the computers that secure the network.
Those computers are called miners. Miners run the software that produces new blocks, checks that every transaction inside them is valid, and adds them to the shared record. In exchange, they earn BTC. That reward has two parts. First, whenever a block is produced, the network creates a fixed amount of new BTC and hands it to the miner who produced it. Second, the miner collects the transaction fees that users of that block paid.
Both parts flow to miners. Neither part flows to token holders. Holding BTC in a wallet earns nothing. This is a design choice, and it has been the design since the network began.
The supply is fixed at twenty-one million
The rules of Bitcoin permit exactly 21,000,000 BTC to ever exist, and no more. This limit is enforced by the software every computer on the network runs, not by a company's promise. To change it would require every miner and every node to voluntarily install different software, and the network has never done that in sixteen years of operation.
About 20,360,000 BTC have been created so far. The remaining 640,000 will be issued gradually to miners as block rewards, at a rate that halves approximately every four years. The final BTC is expected around the year 2140.
Nothing else in the economic block matches this simplicity. There is no team allocation, no foundation reserve, no ecosystem grant pool, no vesting schedule, no private sale unlocking on a future date. The single word Bitcoin's records use for the recipient of every BTC that will ever be created is "mining rewards", and the number next to it is 100 percent.
Source: DefiLlama emissions
The money the network earns
The Bitcoin network earned $85,478,939 in transaction fees during the year to 24 August 2026. The record covers about 92 percent of that year, with the remaining 8 percent falling into gaps in the data source; the true annual figure is slightly higher than the measured one. Across its whole life the measurement has captured $4,435,495,666.
This is a small number relative to the value of the network. Bitcoin's market capitalisation is $1.42 trillion, and a network worth that much earns less than $100 million a year in transaction fees. On any ordinary business metric the ratio would be alarming.
It is not alarming here, because Bitcoin is not an ordinary business. It does not sell a product for a fee. What it sells, if anything, is the property of being final, scarce, and settlable without permission. The fees it earns are the cost of using the network for a payment. They are not the reason anyone owns BTC.
Source: DefiLlama chain fees
Where the money goes
Every dollar of fee revenue paid on Bitcoin flows to one recipient. Miners. Not the token holders, not a foundation, not a company, not a treasury. There is no fee switch, no buyback, no dividend, no burn. A wallet holding BTC receives nothing from the network's activity, and this has always been true.
The same applies to newly-minted BTC. When the network creates a new coin, it hands it to the miner who produced the block that contained it. Miners receive the entire economic output of the network in two forms, transaction fees and new coin issuance, and everything that reaches token holders reaches them only through the price of BTC on the open market.
The protocol itself keeps nothing. There is no company behind Bitcoin taking a cut, no foundation collecting a percentage, no development team funded by network revenue. Everyone who works on Bitcoin does so either voluntarily, or paid by a third party such as an exchange or a research institution.
Source: DefiLlama methodology
The price, against the earning
Bitcoin's market value is $1,423,640,481,944, and the fees the network is currently earning are running at about $75,724,076 a year.
Divide one by the other and you get a price of roughly eighteen thousand eight hundred times the current annual takings. That number is enormous by any measure the framework normally applies. It is more than a hundred times the level at which the same test asked serious questions of Chainlink, and more than seventy times the level for Solana.
But it is the wrong test for Bitcoin. What this ratio measures is whether a company's price makes sense as a claim on its future earnings, and Bitcoin does not have earnings in that sense. It is a monetary asset. Its market value reflects what people will pay to own a fixed-supply, permissionless, non-sovereign form of money, and that value has essentially nothing to do with the fees paid to miners.
A gold coin does not have a price-to-earnings ratio, because gold does not earn. Bitcoin is closer to that than to a company, and this ratio is not the right instrument for pricing a monetary asset. The ratio is stated here so a reader can take the harder view if they choose. Even taken at face value, it does not change the verdict.
Source: DefiLlama fees, CoinGecko market cap
Who runs Bitcoin
Nobody runs Bitcoin. There is no company. There is no foundation. There is no CEO, no board, no treasury, no shareholders. The people who write the software that Bitcoin nodes run are unpaid volunteers, or paid by third parties who have no formal authority over the network.
Anyone can propose a change to Bitcoin's software. A change becomes real only if the people running Bitcoin nodes, and the miners producing blocks, all decide to install and enforce it. If they do not, the change does not happen, regardless of who proposed it or how well-reasoned it is.
This is unusual, and it is the reason why Bitcoin's rules have barely changed since 2009. Not because the rules are perfect, and not because nobody has tried, but because agreement across a genuinely decentralised set of parties is hard to achieve.
Governance resists capture
Because nobody runs Bitcoin, the standard way projects get taken over does not apply. There is no board to elect, no treasury to raid, no controlling stake to acquire, no key executive to replace. A hostile takeover of Bitcoin means convincing every miner and every node operator to voluntarily install different software, which is a fundamentally different exercise from acquiring a company.
The clearest demonstration of this is a 2015 attempt to change Bitcoin's block-size rules through a fork called Bitcoin XT. The fork had backing from several core developers and was launched with real momentum. It failed because the community that ran Bitcoin nodes declined to upgrade. By January 2016, only about ten percent of blocks on the network had been signed by XT nodes, and the effort was abandoned.
The mechanism is not a promise or a guarantee. It is a description of what the network is, structurally. Bitcoin is defended not by law and not by trust but by the fact that changing it requires the voluntary cooperation of a large, decentralised, permissionless group of participants who cannot be compelled.
What Hold means for someone holding BTC
Bitcoin is a form of digital money that has been operating continuously for sixteen years, is owned by no one, is administered by no one, and cannot be created beyond a fixed limit of twenty-one million units. What it is meant to do, it does; what it does not claim to do, it does not do; and the record contains no finding that its holders are being extracted from, misled, or replaced by insiders.
The case in favour is close to the maximum this framework produces. There is no take rate, because there is no party taking. There is no insider allocation, because the allocation table has one line in it and that line is mining rewards. There is no cliff unlock, no vesting schedule, no future release of tokens to a founder or a foundation, because none exists. Every question directed at whether the project extracts unfair value, misrepresents itself, or enriches insiders at the expense of holders came back clean.
The case against is one line, and it is a valuation point rather than a project point. Bitcoin is worth $1.42 trillion, and it earns less than $100 million a year in fees. On any ordinary business metric, that is not a passing grade. Bitcoin's answer is that it is not an ordinary business and should not be measured as one; a reader who agrees will find the verdict solid, and a reader who disagrees will find the same verdict solid on different grounds, because Bitcoin's other tests come back clean regardless.
Hold does not mean buy now. It is a judgment about whether Bitcoin is still standing in ten years, and it says nothing about today's price or about whether this is a good week to own it.
Hold is what that combination is worth. A network that has operated continuously since 2009, a supply cap that has never been changed, a governance that has demonstrably resisted capture, an emissions table with one line in it, and a set of rules that anyone in the world can read and no company can revise. The judgment about whether Bitcoin is still here in a decade turns on continuities, not on projections.
Someone who owns BTC owns a share of a fixed supply of a form of money that nobody else can create. They do not own an income stream, because the network pays holders nothing. They do not own influence over the network's direction, because nobody has that. What they own is a claim on a scarce asset whose scarcity is enforced by consensus rather than by promise, and the value of that claim is whatever the market decides it is worth.
ROI through the years
Bought and held to 9 September 2026, never traded. Each row is a different entry point, and each carries the worst fall a holder sat through along the way.
Bought 10 years ago, September 2016
+12,478%
Bought 5 years ago, September 2021
+69%
Bought 3 years ago, September 2023
+202%
Returns and falls are measured on daily closing prices, so a one-minute crash that did not settle cannot enter them. The worst drop is the largest peak-to-trough fall inside that row's window, not the token's all-time worst. Bars sit on a log scale of what one dollar became. Sources: Kraken, Coinbase.
What could not be answered
Two things about Bitcoin are not answered on this page, because the information needed to answer them was not available.
How BTC is spread across the people holding it. The measurement of ownership across Bitcoin wallets, how the total sits between large and small holders, and how the supply is moving between exchanges and private storage was not accessible for this page. Broad ownership and concentrated ownership look different from each other in ways that could not be reported.
What the people funding Bitcoin's development publish about their intentions. Bitcoin has no company behind it, and the developers who maintain the software do so through a variety of arrangements that are not centrally disclosed. A structured account of who funds what work, and to what ends, was not available in the sources this page reads.
Karinva takes no payment from any project it covers.
Stay with Karinva
Leave your email and you will get a welcome, then one email a month with our view of the industry, and an invitation to the Karinva community. Nothing else.